Over the summer, communities across the country took to the streets to demand justice for the police killing of George Floyd. In Nevada, months of large-scale protests showed the urgent need for transparency and accountability in a criminal legal system that treats Black and Brown bodies as dispensable.

In response, Democratic lawmakers acknowledged system inequities, including problems with policing, declared racism a public health issue, and expressed support for substantive change. Nevada took some baby steps forward during a special session last year: The Legislature approved Assembly Bill 3, which banned police officers’ use of chokeholds and established a duty to intervene.

Gov. Steve Sisolak signed the bill into law and released a statement in support, saying, “My administration will continue to pursue change, we will not go back to the status quo and we will continue to actively listen to those whose voices have been drowned out or forgotten in the past.”

Promise noted.

But advocates, activists, and community members stood firm that minimal advances were insufficient to address the breadth and depth of systemic racism and police violence. AB3 lacked meaningful accountability measures, and there’s a wealth of other issues that need to be addressed.

Our coalition made this clear to legislative leadership last week — check out the letter from the Justice Reform and Accountability Alliance below.

The ACLU of Nevada and the JRAA are pursuing numerous policy reforms to tackle systemic issues during the 2021 session.

THE ABOLITION OF CAPITAL PUNISHMENT

Ending capital punishment has always been a major goal for the ACLU of Nevada. The death penalty is the ultimate denial of civil liberties. Here in Nevada, no drug company will provide the necessary drugs to perform executions and yet death penalty cases are still be tried, costing the taxpayers millions.

We have a tough fight ahead of us, but this may be our last viable opportunity for a long time to push for repeal.

THE END OF QUALIFIED IMMUNITY

Qualified immunity for police officers is one of the biggest barriers to meaningful accountability. We need to make it clear that civil rights violations will not be swept away by procedural roadblocks, and we need more stringent use-of-force standards requiring that the use of any level of force must be both reasonable and necessary.

POLICE TRANSPARENCY AND DATA

Transparency is the floor when it comes to police accountability. Nevada needs to collect, analyze, and publish data regarding complaints of officer misconduct and any discipline imposed pursuant to such complaints, as well as data regarding all vehicular and pedestrian stops and post-stop policing broken down by location as well as race, sex, age, and other relevant demographics.

INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATIONS

Police investigating police for excessive force is an ineffective process that hurts our communities’ trust. The establishment of a Special Prosecutor or a panel of independent prosecutors to investigate — and prosecute when necessary — cases involving officer-involved homicides or use of force that results in serious bodily harm.

LEARN MORE ABOUT THE 2021 SESSION OF THE NEVADA LEGISLATURE

SIGN UP FOR UPDATES FROM THE ACLU OF NEVADA

JOIN THE ACLUNV ACTION TEAM TO FIGHT FOR CHANGE AT THE LEGISLATURE

Date

Monday, February 1, 2021 - 9:45am

Featured image

Photograph of the Nevada Legislature building in Carson City

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Share Image

Photograph of the Nevada Legislature building in Carson City

Documents

Show related content

Pinned related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

926

Show PDF in viewer on page

Style

Standard with sidebar

Teaser subhead

The Legislature declared racism a public health crisis and promised reforms in the 2021 session. It’s time to make sure they act.

Get the information you need to participate in the 81st session of the Nevada Legislature.

ABOUT THE NEVADA LEGISLATURE

Nevada’s legislative process is defined in Article 4 of the Nevada Constitution. It sets when the Legislature meets, lays out the structure for the Legislature, and defines the legislative process.

Nevada’s legislature meets in odd-numbered years for 120 consecutive days beginning the first Monday in February. This year, the session runs from Monday, Feb. 1 to May 31. Like the federal government, Nevada has a bicameral legislature. The two houses are called the Assembly and the Senate.

 

FOLLOW THE NEVADA LEGISLATURE

The Nevada Legislature will consider hundreds of bills over the course of the session. There are multiple hearings per day. Get to know your way around the Nevada Electronic Legislative Information System (NELIS) to find information on bills, committee hearings, and more.

VISIT NELIS FOR BILL INFORMATION

WATCH THE NEVADA LEGISLATURE ON YOUTUBE

 

FIND YOUR LEGISLATORS

The term of office for Nevada’s legislators mirrors the terms of our federal Congress, but Nevada’s legislators are subject to term limits. Members of the Nevada Assembly serve two-year terms. If reelected, they are limited to six terms, or 12 total years in the Assembly. Members of the Nevada Senate serve four-year terms. If reelected, they are limited to three terms, or 12 total years in the Senate.

FIND YOUR LEGISLATOR AND DISTRICT

SENATE CONTACT INFO

ASSEMBLY CONTACT INFO

 

REGISTER TO PARTICIPATE IN COMMITTEE MEETINGS

On NELIS, anviagte to the "Meetings & Floor Sessions" page and select the "Participate" button to register. You will be taken to a form to fill in your information (much like the paper sign-in sheets we used for in-person meetings), select agenda items you are interested in, note your position on agenda items, indicate whether or not you want to speak, and mark who you represent. If you would simply like to let the committee know you are "in the room" as a resource, you do not have to choose the 'I want to speak' option; you also do not have to choose a specific agenda item or position.

GO TO 'MEETINGS & FLOOR SESSIONS'

Once you submit your registration, you will receive a confirmation screen, as well as an email, with the phone number and meeting ID you will need to call in to at the time of the meeting. Registering to participate does not guarantee you will get to speak; the amount of testimony taken and who testifies are at the discretion of the committee chair.

 

REMOTE TESTIMONTY IN COMMITTEE MEETINGS

If you registered for the meeting in advance, you will be contacted by staff if you have been approved to join the video call. You can also use the phone number and meeting ID provided in the registration confirmation to join the audio-only call.

If you will be joining the video call, use the connection information provided by staff to connect at least 45 minutes in advance of the meeting. This will allow staff to ensure you are able to connect and help you check your audio/video. If you will be joining to audio-only call, use the phone number and meeting ID provided to dial in and enter the waiting room. You may dial in before or during the meeting.

During the meeting, the committee chair will announce when an agenda item is up, as well as when public testimony will be taken in each position. For the audio-only call, staff will let you know what keys to press to raise your hand or to unmute yourself; in this call, staff will call on you to speak by the last three digits of the phone number you've used to dial in. If you experience any issues connecting during the meeting, you may call (775) 684-6990 for assistance.

 

SUBMIT WRITTEN TESTIMONY

Refer to the committee meeting agenda for details specific to each committee. You can generally send your written comments to the committee email found on the overview tab in a section called "Contact Information." 

GET MORE INFO ON STANDING COMMITTEES

 

SHARE YOUR OPINION USING A SIMPLE FORM

The Legislature uses a form in which you can select a bill or resolution, note whether you are in favor or or against the measure, add your comments, and provide your information. Your address only to determine your legislative district so legislators can see comments by the constituents in their districts. Comments submitted through this site are not made part of the public record, but are accessible to all legislators. 

SHARE YOUR OPINION WITH YOUR LEGISLATOR

Date

Sunday, January 31, 2021 - 2:30pm

Featured image

Photograph of the Nevada Legislature building in Carson City

Photograph of the Nevada Legislature building in Carson City. (Ken Lund / flikr)

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Share Image

Photograph of the Nevada Legislature building in Carson City

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

23

Show PDF in viewer on page

Style

Standard with sidebar

Teaser subhead

The 2021 Legislature is going remote because of the pandemic. Learn how to follow along and make your voice heard.

By Shige Sakurai

My driver’s license is just like yours. It has my photo, date of birth, and other standard descriptors. Under gender, however, you’ll find not M or F, but X.
 
In 2017, I became the first person in the country to obtain an official nonbinary, gender-neutral X-marker on my driver’s license. I live in Washington D.C., which was among the first jurisdictions in the U.S. to officially offer an X marker to recognize nonbinary people as well as those who simply want a gender-neutral form of ID. At the same time, D.C. also removed requirements for a medical or third-party certification of gender to correct a gender marker. I’m proud to have joined LGBTQ+ activists in D.C. in making these policies happen.

Movements for trans and nonbinary equity have made significant progress since I got my nonbinary ID in 2017. Across the country, more than 124 million people live in jurisdictions that are now issuing state IDs with X markers, and over 93 million live in jurisdictions that issue birth certificates with an X designation.

Still, only 11 percent of trans people nationwide have an accurate name and gender marker on all IDs and records. Sixty-eight percent do not have any IDs displaying their accurate name and gender. And at the federal level, the government still does not permit gender neutral or nonbinary markers on passports, social security records, and most other federal documents. It’s time for our federal government to catch up. The Biden administration has an opportunity to affirm trans and nonbinary rights by permitting X gender markers on all federal IDs.

The first time I used my nonbinary driver’s license was to pass through airport security, and I prepared for the worst. I brought copies of the D.C. policy and newspaper articles about it, so if somebody were to question me or say I had a fraudulent ID, I would be able to show them that it’s real. But nobody even seemed to notice or comment upon the X listed for gender. I was glad. I have flown many times since then without ever having someone question the gender on my ID.

Shige Sakurai with flowering tree in background

I had a similar experience when I tried to use my first birth certificate with an X marker, which I got from Connecticut in 2019. I decided to try it out on my way home from a cruise trip later that year. Again, I planned for the worst. I made an emergency plan, alerted some friends, and put a 24-hour legal hotline on speed dial in case I was detained. And again, despite all my fears and all my preparation, the immigration officials did not seem to notice the X gender marker.

My X-marked ID means a lot to me, especially as a U.S. citizen of Japanese descent. In Japan, the term x-gender (x-jendā) has existed since the 1990s to describe gender nonbinary people. Other countries recognize X designations under international passport standards, and a growing number of countries include an X designation option on their passports. But my U.S. passport still does not have an X marker.

Applying for My First Nonbinary Passport

President Biden promised to support X-marker IDs when he was running for office, but I’m not going to wait around for that promise to officially materialize. I believe I have a legal and human right to access accurate ID documents. All my other documents say I am nonbinary. So why shouldn’t my passport reflect the same? Anything else would be a lie.
 
On Inauguration Day, I went to a passport acceptance facility to apply for an accurate, nonbinary passport in person. To prepare, I assembled various documents to support my case, including my nonbinary birth certificate and driver’s license, as well as a court order that declares I am nonbinary. I also provided medical certification, which is something that the Department of State currently requests of all transgender people applying for a corrected gender marker, but which presents massive barriers to accessing accurate ID. Getting medical certification could mean finding and paying for unnecessary medical appointments just for a provider to fill out paperwork.

Even the American Medical Association says the gender on our IDs should be “as reported by the individual and without need for verification by a medical professional.” Medical certification is a waste of time and money. We are in the midst of a horrifying pandemic, and forcing healthcare providers to go through unnecessary appointments and paperwork is ridiculous. It also forces trans people to make difficult decisions about potentially spending hundreds of dollars on medical appointments and having to come out to a physician, which is not always the safest and best choice, especially when many providers still have little to no training on trans and nonbinary issues.

U.S. Passport application

When I first came out to my physician as nonbinary and asked for his support, I was terrified that he would say no, and that it would deteriorate the trust in our relationship, or even end it. Fortunately, he gave me a fierce yes, and told me he agreed that the government’s requirement of medical certification for this matter is absurd.
 
In my doctor’s certification letter, he explained that my access to nonbinary ID is important for my health and wellbeing, which is his priority. He also explained that it aligns with contemporary medical standards, and it’s important for the accurate counting of nonbinary people in government demographic data. Whether it’s for the U.S. Census or for social research, we need to know the differences and disparities in our communities. When trans or nonbinary people are not included in demographic data, it means our communities do not get the funding and support we deserve. That’s one of the reasons why the federal government should ensure access to accurate gender markers not just for passports, but for Social Security and other records as well. As a nonbinary person, I want to be counted.

I have a lot of privilege that has allowed me to break barriers and move through the world: I have had access to higher education, a certain amount of time and resources, networks of activist friends, and lawyers who can help. And yet, I’ve experienced street harassment and even physical assault because of being nonbinary. I’ve also seen editorials written to demean me, and horrifying comments on news articles saying that nonbinary people should be sent to a “guillotine” or “gas chamber.” All of these acts of violence seek to erase me. I do not need the federal government erasing me, too. 

It’s a depressing and degrading experience for your government to deny your existence. I am lucky to have had a positive outcome with my physician and IDs, but for many trans or nonbinary people, being forced to get medical certification just to have an accurate passport can be devastating to their health and finances. Nobody should be forced to present documents that tell lies about who you are, and trans and nonbinary people should not have to endure cruel legal confrontations in order to access our human rights. The reality is that cisgender people are not forced to get these same medical certifications when they apply for passports. It’s a discriminatory policy.
 
I have long said that gender markers should not be necessary on IDs, and there are human rights principles that agree. We will keep working with the government to evaluate where they can remove gender markers, but the first steps are to ensure everyone has access to an accurate ID and remove unnecessary barriers such as medical certification requirements and other expenses. The Biden administration must issue an executive order directing all federal agencies to add a nonbinary and gender-neutral X designation to all federal IDs and records, and to remove documentation requirements for updating gender markers. We must make sure the administration follows through on ensuring our right to an accurate ID that represents who we are.
 
In the meantime, I’m not waiting around.

Date

Wednesday, January 27, 2021 - 10:00am

Featured image

Shige Sakurai with the sky in the background.

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Share Image

ACLU: Share image

Show related content

Imported from National NID

38965

Menu parent dynamic listing

926

Imported from National VID

39041

Imported from National Link

Show PDF in viewer on page

Style

Standard with sidebar

Teaser subhead

The Biden administration must follow through on ensuring our right to an accurate ID that represents who we are.

Pages

Subscribe to ACLU of Nevada RSS